tucg

bfawuFBU Logo JPEGnapo logo2nujNUT

pcspoaRMTucuurtu

Today’s (18) defeat for the Cabinet Office in the High Court over its latest cuts to redundancy pay for civil servants is a major blow for Theresa May's “weak and unstable” government, the Public and Commercial Services union says.
The union successfully took a judicial review after being excluded from negotiations over changes to the civil service compensation scheme – which governs voluntary and compulsory redundancy terms for the government’s workforce.
Civil servants made redundant in the last eight months could now have a claim for compensation after being left thousands of pounds worse off.
In court the union, by far the largest in the civil service, argued the former Cabinet Office minister Ben Gummer – who lost his seat at the general election – failed in his legal “duty to consult with a view to reaching agreement” by excluding it from more than a dozen meetings attended by most of the smaller unions.
After initial talks on proposals for new, worsened terms in early 2016 a senior Cabinet Office official wrote to the civil service unions in June of that year to propose a further round, but stated:
“I want to be clear that attendance at any further discussions will be taken as a clear commitment that those unions engaging in the talks have accepted that the proposal above will form the basis of a reformed, negotiated, set of arrangements that their relevant executives can recommend acceptance to their members in any ballot.”
PCS, the Prison Officers’ Association and Unite refused to agree to this, so were excluded. All the other civil service unions agreed to take part on that basis. The judges conclude it was “not surprising [the three unions] were unable to give such a commitment”.
In the judgement handed down today (18), Lord Justice Sales and Mrs Justice Whipple add: “There was no basis on which the Minister was entitled to exclude the PCSU from the consultation.”

Read more: PCS: DEFEAT FOR GOVERNMENT IN HIGH COURT OVER REDUNDANCY CUTS

Today the Fire brigades Union (FBU), National Union of Teachers (NUT) and the Association of Teachers and Lecturers ( ATL ) have written to Justine Greening seeking urgent reassurances about fire safety in schools in light of the tragic and avoidable fire at Grenfell Tower last week.

The NUT and FBU have been pressing the Government since last year to reverse its proposed changes to fire safety requirements for school buildings which, in our view, show a total disregard for the health and safety of children and staff.

Last summer, the Government announced that the expectation that sprinklers should be fitted in new schools in England would be removed from its Building Bulletin guidance. Although it responded to NUT and FBU protests by claiming that it was still consulting, its proposed replacement Building Bulletin clearly set out the Government’s intention: ‘The Building Regulations do not require the installation of fire sprinkler suppression systems in school buildings for life safety and therefore [guidelines] no longer include an expectation that most new school buildings will be fitted with them.’

Of equal concern is the fact that, unbelievably, the proposed replacement Building Bulletin also made changes to fire compartmentalisation requirements, increasing the permitted size of compartmented areas in all schools and removing the requirement for each floor to be compartmented in unsprinklered schools, and removed sections from the original 2007 Bulletin discouraging the use of combustible materials for building cladding. The NUT, FBU and ATL believe that, in combination, these three changes significantly increase the fire risk in schools.

The NUT and FBU have been repeatedly refused access to information about responses to the consultation, including which respondents, if any, were in favour of the removal of the sprinkler expectation. Refusing to provide this information suggests that there was little, if any, support for the proposed move and leads us to conclude that the driving force is the desire to build new schools as cheaply as possible, even if this means playing fast and loose with the health and safety of children and school staff.

It is important to view these moves in the context of the repeated undermining and belittling of health and safety by Government since 2010, and the savage cuts affecting schools. In 2012 David Cameron’s proud boast was that his New Year’s resolution was to ‘kill off the health and safety culture for good’. He also said that his Government was ‘waging war against the excessive culture that has become an albatross around the neck of British businesses.’ These remarks seemed offensive at the time but now seem crass in the extreme.

This issue has been dragging on for nearly a year and clarity is now urgently needed about the Government’s definitive position on the fitting of sprinklers in new schools, the use of combustible materials for cladding school buildings and allowing larger unsprinklered compartments in schools.

Kevin Courtney, NUT General Secretary, said: ‘The Government has behaved shamefully over this issue. It is high time the health and safety of children and staff is prioritised. We call upon the Government to make an immediate announcement that it will no longer proceed with down-grading fire safety in schools.’

Matt Wrack, FBU General Secretary said: “It is staggering we still have to have this debate with the Government in the current circumstances. It highlights the endless problems we have faced when raising fire safety issues over several years.”

Mary Bousted, ATL General Secretary, said: “Dr Mary Bousted, general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers (ATL), said: “It is shocking that the Government continues to ignore the recommendations on fire safety in schools. The Government - now more than ever - needs to make assurances that they will prioritise the health and safety of pupils and staff in school buildings and implement the changes required to keep them safe.”

THE FIREFIGHTERS' DILEMMA

TUCG: MARK SERWOTKA ON THE FIGHT AGAINST AUSTERITY

cool it-218px

 

 

Trade Union news

livemarks   BFAWU  livemarks  PCS  livemarks   FBU 

livemarks  POA   livemarks  NAPO  livemarks    RMT 

livemarks  NUJ   livemarks   NUT   livemarks  URTU

NO TTIP

Search the site

BOOK: COST OF LIVING CRISIS

TheCostofLivingCrisis-jpeg 1

By MIchael Calderbank

Foreword by Mark Serwotka, PCS General Secretary

 

Buy now from www.radicalread.co.uk

Based on research commissioned by the TUCG, the book examines why costs have risen for all items of expenditure, ranging from housing and child care to food and transport. He makes practical proposals on how these costs can be reduced. He also delivers an uncompromising message to the leaders of all mainstream Westminster Parties: it is time to end the politics of austerity, an ideological project to cut the size of the state permanently.

FAMILY JUSTICE

New pamphlet on the effect of legal aid cuts on Family Justice.  Double click the picture below to dowload.

FamilyJustice

 

 

THE GREAT PAY ROBBERY

 

great pay robbery1

 

The impact of falling real wages, benefit cuts and soaring housing costs - with a foreword by Mark Serwotka (General Secretary, PCS).  Click image to download.

COST OF LIVING CRISIS

Cost of Living

 

 Click the image to download the new pamphlet from TUCG, looking at how the cost of living is impacting on working families, and what kind of measures are needed to really make a difference (with a foreword by Mick Cash, RMT General Secretary).